Human-centered design systems and product experiences
Core services
01UI/UX Design02Web Development03Software Development042D/3D Experiences05App Development06AI Agents & Automation07Website DesignTechnical services
Frontend Engineering
React DevelopmentNext.js DevelopmentWeb ApplicationsEnterprise DashboardsSaaS PlatformsBackend & Infrastructure
API DevelopmentCloud InfrastructureDevOps & CI/CDBackend SystemsCustom SoftwareIndustries we serve
Technology & Software
AI Website SEO Monitoring Agent Development
Site regressions, found early
An agent that watches your own website for the technical changes that cost search visibility.
An agent that watches your own website for the technical changes that cost search visibility. It crawls on a schedule, compares each page with its last known good state, and prepares a short, ordered list of fixes with the evidence for each.
Websites break quietly. A template change removes the description from two hundred pages. A redesign drops a heading. A page is deleted and forty links now lead nowhere. Nobody notices, because the site still looks fine. The drop in traffic shows up weeks later, and by then the cause is one of thirty changes made since.
This page describes a workflow we propose to build as a custom project. It does not exist as software yet. It would build on the crawl and validation scripts we wrote and ran for this website, which check every route's status, title, description, canonical, headings, structured data and links. Scheduling, change detection against a baseline and the fix queue are not built as an agent.
Six jobs it carries through
Scheduled crawl
Reads every page of your site regularly.
- Follows your sitemap and internal links
- Records status, redirects and canonical
- Reads titles, descriptions and headings
- Respects your server with a polite rate
Baseline comparison
Detects what changed.
- Compares each page with its last good state
- Separates intended from unexpected changes
- Groups changes that share a cause
- Dates when each change first appeared
Indexability check
Checks pages can be found and indexed.
- Robots rules and noindex settings
- Canonicals that point elsewhere
- Pages missing from the sitemap
- Orphan pages with no links
Structured data check
Validates what search engines read.
- Valid syntax
- Types that match the page
- Markup that mirrors visible content
- Fields that went missing
Prioritised fixes
Says what to fix first.
- Problems on important pages first
- One fix per shared cause
- The pages affected
- What to change and where
Release check
Checks after every deployment.
- Runs after you publish
- Compares with the state before
- Reports within the same hour
- Confirms when a fix worked
What Goes Wrong Without It
Breakage nobody sees
The page looks right and its title tag is empty.
Template changes at scale
One edit alters two hundred pages at once.
Links to deleted pages
A removed page leaves dozens of dead internal links.
Accidental blocking
A setting meant for a test page hides a section from search engines.
Audit reports with a thousand rows
Everything is listed and nothing is prioritised.
Cause found too late
Traffic falls, and the change that caused it was a month ago.
Walk One Real Case Through It
Thirty minutes, one case from your own process. We map it against the workflow on this page and tell you plainly what can be reused from our demonstrations and what has to be built for your systems.
From the First Signal to the Record
An example of one case, in 6 steps. The same steps play in the picture at the top of this page.
Baseline taken
The site is crawled and each page's state is stored as the baseline.
Change published
Your team publishes a template update on a Thursday afternoon.
Crawl repeated
The post-release crawl finds descriptions missing on every page that uses that template.
Cause grouped
Two hundred findings are reported as one cause, with three example pages.
Fix prepared
The fix names the template field to restore and lists the pages affected.
Fix confirmed
After the correction the crawl runs again and reports the pages as restored.
The Systems Around It
The systems named here are the kind this agent works with. Which ones it connects to in your case is settled in the scope.
Website
- Your sitemap and pages
Search Console
- Coverage and performance data, where you grant access
Deployment
- A signal when a new version is published
Key pages
- The pages that matter most to you
Fix queue
- Your task system
History
- Stored crawls for comparison
It Watches and Reports, Your Team Changes the Site
The agent has read access to your public site and, if you grant it, to Search Console. It has no access to change pages, settings or redirects. What it produces is a dated, evidence-backed list of what changed and what to fix.
It reports what it can see: whether a page is technically sound. Whether a page is indexed or ranks is only visible in the search engine's own tools, and it says so when that data is missing.
- Read access only
- Before and after for every change
- One finding per shared cause
- Priority from your key pages
- Runs after every release
- No claims about rankings
Straight Answers
An audit tool produces a full report when you run it. This agent runs continuously, remembers the last good state of every page and tells you what changed since, grouped by cause and ordered by your priorities. It is built to catch a regression on the day it happens.
The research agent plans new pages. This agent protects existing ones. It never suggests what to write. It tells you when something you already published stopped being readable by search engines.
Only with access to Search Console, and then it reports what that tool shows. Without it, the agent can verify that a page is technically indexable. It does not infer indexing or rankings from a crawl.
Not as software yet. This page describes a proposed workflow. It would build on the crawl and validation scripts we wrote and ran for this website, which check every route's status, title, description, canonical, headings, structured data and links. Scheduling, change detection against a baseline and the fix queue are not built as an agent. A project starts by mapping your process, then proving the first steps on test data before anything touches a live system.
Take a Baseline of Your Site
The first crawl usually finds issues that have been there for months. From then on, every change is caught against it.