Human-centered design systems and product experiences
Core services
01UI/UX Design02Web Development03Software Development042D/3D Experiences05App Development06AI Agents & Automation07Website DesignTechnical services
Frontend Engineering
React DevelopmentNext.js DevelopmentWeb ApplicationsEnterprise DashboardsSaaS PlatformsBackend & Infrastructure
API DevelopmentCloud InfrastructureDevOps & CI/CDBackend SystemsCustom SoftwareIndustries we serve
Technology & Software
AI Manufacturing Maintenance Agent Development
The fault described, the job prepared
An agent for maintenance teams in a plant.
An agent for maintenance teams in a plant. When a fault is reported or a reading drifts, it gathers the asset's history and the approved procedure, prepares a work order with parts and safety steps, and passes it to a planner. It controls no equipment.
A line stops and a technician is called. They know this machine, but not that it had the same fault twice last quarter, or which spare is in the stores. The manual is a file on a shared drive. The work order is written afterwards, briefly, so the history that would help next time is thin. Experienced technicians carry the plant in their heads, and they are retiring.
This page describes a workflow we propose to build as a custom project. It does not exist as software yet. It would reuse the runbook matching and the escalation with a trace from our IT helpdesk demonstration, where guidance comes only from approved runbooks. Asset histories, parts lookups and connection to a maintenance system are not built.
Six jobs it carries through
Fault intake
Takes the report properly.
- The asset, from a tag or a scan
- The symptom, in the reporter's words
- Photos and readings
- When it started
Asset history
Brings the machine's past to the job.
- Earlier faults and repairs
- Parts replaced and when
- Open work orders
- Patterns across similar assets
Approved procedure
Finds the procedure for the job.
- The maker's manual and your procedures
- The safety and lock-out steps first
- The revision and its date
- Says when no procedure exists
Parts and tools
Checks what the job needs.
- Parts from the procedure and the history
- Stock in your stores
- Lead times for what is missing
- Tools and permits required
Work order preparation
Prepares the order for the planner.
- Scope, steps, parts and safety
- Estimated from past jobs, where they exist
- Priority by your rules
- Held for the planner's review
Close-out record
Makes the record worth having.
- What was found and done
- Parts used and readings after
- Follow-up work raised
- Notes for next time
Six Things That Slow This Down
History in people's heads
The technician who knows the machine is on leave.
The manual nobody can find
The procedure exists, in a folder on a shared drive.
Repeat faults unnoticed
The same failure recurs and nobody connects them.
Parts not in stock
The job is planned and the spare is on a six-week order.
Thin work orders
"Fixed pump" tells the next person nothing.
Advice on live equipment
An assistant suggests a step that skips lock-out.
What We Need to Scope This
- The process as it runs today, in a few lines.
- The systems it touches, for example maintenance system, asset data, procedures, stores.
- Rough monthly volume, and who approves what.
One Case, Start to Finish
An example of one case, in 6 steps. The same steps play in the picture at the top of this page.
Fault reported
An operator scans a conveyor's tag and reports a grinding noise from the drive.
History found
The same drive had a bearing replaced four months ago, and a similar noise was noted a month later.
Procedure found
Your approved procedure for the drive is retrieved, beginning with isolation and lock-out.
Parts checked
The bearing is in stock. The seal is not, and has a lead time of a week.
Order prepared
A work order is drafted with the steps, the parts and the repeat-fault note.
Planner decides
The planner schedules it for the next shift change and orders the seal.
What It Reads and Writes
The systems named here are the kind this agent works with. Which ones it connects to in your case is settled in the scope.
Maintenance system
- SAP PM
- IBM Maximo
- Fiix
- or your CMMS
Asset data
- Tags, hierarchy and histories
Procedures
- Manuals and your approved procedures
Stores
- Spare parts stock and lead times
Sensor data
- Readings and alarms, where you expose them
Planners
- The people who approve and schedule work
It Prepares Maintenance Work and Controls Nothing on the Floor
The agent has no connection to machines or control systems. It reads records and procedures and prepares a work order. Every procedure it shows begins with the safety and isolation steps from your approved document, and it offers no step that is not in one.
A planner approves the work, and the technician doing it remains responsible for doing it safely. Where no approved procedure exists, the agent says so.
- No connection to equipment
- Only approved procedures
- Safety steps always first
- Stock read live
- A planner approves every order
- The technician confirms the record
What Buyers Ask First
Not by itself. It can start from an alarm or a drifting reading if you expose that data, and it will notice a fault that keeps recurring. Predicting failures from sensor data is a separate modelling task that could feed it.
Property maintenance starts from a resident's message and its difficulties are access and approvals. This agent works with technicians and planners on industrial assets, and its value is history, procedures and parts.
It shows the approved procedure for that asset, with its revision. It does not write its own instructions. Where a procedure is missing or out of date, it reports that to the engineer responsible.
Not as software yet. This page describes a proposed workflow. It would reuse the runbook matching and the escalation with a trace from our IT helpdesk demonstration, where guidance comes only from approved runbooks. Asset histories, parts lookups and connection to a maintenance system are not built. A project starts by mapping your process, then proving the first steps on test data before anything touches a live system.
Pick the Asset That Fails Most
We will read its work-order history with you and show what a technician would see at the next fault.
